powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
 Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Academic Progress Rates


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Academic Progress Rates
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 15, 2007

May 7, 2008 4:20 pm
NCAA just released APR which based on eligibility, retention, and graduation of scholarship student-athletes. So, far we performed well with 21 out 24 athletic programs met well above the cut off points.

Our crosstown just received their sanction and limit their basketball scholarship to 11 from maximum of 13. Other than their players didn't graduate, the APR also took consideration of players transferred or leaving early into the calculation.

We have had players transferred (Wright and Stanback) and leaving early (Farmar, Afflalo, Love, and Westbrook). Next year possibly one and done are Holiday or Morgan (if he decided to sign with us). At this rate of players leaving early, our basketball program may face the same sanction as USC.

Coach Howland's 1st recruiting class possibly will have 50% graduation rate with Mata-Real and Shipp graduate (Farmar and Afflalo left early). 2005 class is much better 4 out 5 (Wright transferred). 2006 class could be 2 out of 3 (Westbrook left early). And 2007 class is 0% (Love left early and Stanback transferred). 2008 class possibly the same scenarios with all the incoming players are NBA talent caliber.

It's great that we're beginning to tunnel in great talents to our basketball programs once more. But with the NBA's 1 year out of high school rule, this APR calculation need to be changed as well. In 2010 when the collective bargaining agreement expired, the rule could be changed to 2 years out of high school. Regardless, the APR calculation need to be modified.

Academic Progress Rates
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 26, 2007

May 11, 2008 10:39 am

I couldn't agree with you more.  While I understand the idea behind the APR, there are also good ideas and bad ideas--and this is a bad one only because it makes no sense in the real world.

The schools and sports programs have absolutely no control, or even influence, over whether an athlete (note that I purposefully didn't say "student-athlete") and his/her family think that it's better to transfer to another school (if they're not good enough to get much playing time--i.e., Wright and Stanback) or go pro (if they're good enough to do so--i.e., Love and Westbrook).  Even though they meet the required academic standards, these athletes can't be forced to stay with one school for the full four years. 

For the APR system to work effectively, the schools would have to focus on recruiting solely mediocre athletes who fill very specific roles on ever-changing, injury-possible teams.  An impossible task.

The Hansbroughs and Collisons of the world are the exceptions, not the rule.  And, again, you can argue that they're completing their four year educations only for personal reasons and not because of anything that the school or basketball programs were able to influence them to do.  So the schools shouldn't be rewarded for the personal decisions made by their athletes and they shouldn't be punished for those personal decisions either.

Even changing the basketball requirement to two years won't fix this system. 


Academic Progress Rates
-
Level:Amateur
Since:May 14, 2008

May 14, 2008 1:16 am
There is still a chance Love or Westbrook could stay. I don't believe they signed with an agency yet, and I know they actually like it here. I can't imagine Love would stay more than one year though, but still....it could happen.