powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?


View Message BoardViews:      


New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 19, 2006

May 5, 2008 5:40 pm

How can you compare the Bills of the early 90s to the Patriots? The Pats atleast won three super bowls.

 

Bills early 90s really no better than the Eagles of 2001-2004.


Not comparing the Bills to the 2001-2004 Patriots, comparing them to the 2005-2007 Patriots.

The Patriots were a dynasty but that has ended, though they are still a great team.


New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 24, 2008

May 5, 2008 9:33 pm
I'm a Chief's fan, so I feel I'm impartial and not even a Pats fan. I would consisder them a dynasty, 3 superbowl wins since 2001. Maybe not yet in the class of the Niners, Cowboys, Steelers or the Packers of the sixties, but by far the dominant team of this decade, which isn't over yet. I think they are likely to win another one this year or next, which would put them in the same class as the rest of the dynastys, 4 Superbowls in a decade. (Dallas won 3 in 4 years.)


New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 5, 2007

May 5, 2008 10:36 pm

Until those tapes are retrieved and the dust settles on whether or not they were gaining an unfair advantage by using them (including the fact that they were beat in this Superbowl by a play they did not get to see practiced by the Giants), that whole "Pat's are a dynasty" thing is on hold.

Otherwise why would the NFL be seeking the Walsh files,.............................they're not out of the woods yet on Spygate.  They may find asterisks by those Superbowls which would exclude them from being officially called a dynasty.

Goodell has already said he's going to drop the hammer (yeah right) on the Patriots if he finds out the Patriots taped the Rams final walk through before that Superbowl, which would effectively put an asterisk by that win if I'm not mistaken.


New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jul 22, 2007

May 6, 2008 7:52 am
I think the 16-0 regular season just this past season, together with the fact that they have won three recent championships, been in five of the last seven AFC championships,Excellent Reply

New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 2, 2007

May 6, 2008 8:35 am
The Patriots were a dynasty, but I agree to keep this "dynasty" tag, you need to keep winning the championship.

New England Patriots: Still a Dynasty?
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 18, 2008

May 6, 2008 3:12 pm
no