| |
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
|
|
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 16, 2006
|
http://blog.mlive.com/jim_carty/2008/04/carty_on_wtka
_april_28.html
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
|
Level:Amateur
Since:Dec 28, 2007
|
|
This message has been removed by the administrator.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:88
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 25, 2008
|
|
Did Mario Manningham really score that low?? I dont ever want to hear any michigan fan talk about academics. You obviously just pass (or pay, in the Fab Fives case) all of ur quality players so they can play athletics. WHAT A JOKE.
Granted that happens everywhere, but u have to draw a line. 6 is scary low. he should have received some sort of assistance. Every fan can agree with that. But hey, at least u guys have family values!!! lol
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 11, 2007
|
Blazer---Let me beat the 4th Graders to it....57-46-1...But since we are talking about Naploeanic History. How's this one Michigan fans: Not relavant this decade.
1-6=Golfing with Gary Moeller off of 8 Mile
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 12, 2007
|
|
Interesting, you refer to us as 4th graders yet you seem to spit out the same nonsense you're condemning. Since you don't like the complete history of the rival, and prefer to focus on its recent results, here is some interesting numbers. From the year 2000, OSU has won, on average, a total of 1 more game a year than Michigan. Now, get off your high horse, shut your pie hole, and come back when you want to talk about football rather the garbage produced thus far.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 11, 2007
|
|
Interesting, you refer to us as 4th graders yet you seem to spit out the same nonsense you're condemning. Since you don't like the complete history of the rival, and prefer to focus on its recent results, here is some interesting numbers. From the year 2000, OSU has won, on average, a total of 1 more game a year than Michigan. Now, get off your high horse, shut your pie hole, and come back when you want to talk about football rather the garbage produced thus far
Here's some football: Since 2000 Ohio State has won, on average, one more game than Michigan. That game seems to occur in the third weekend of November. Now back to filling my pie-hole.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 16, 2006
|
"Since 2000 Ohio State has won, on average, one more game than Michigan."
How much farther back can you go before that slips away?
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 11, 2007
|
uhh, 1999.  . Before 2000, we were owned for about 14 years.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 17, 2008
|
|
MICHIGAN FOOTBALL
11 NATIONAL TITLES, 42 CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS
MOST WINS 869 AND HIGHEST WINNING PERCENTAGE .745 IN NCAA DIVISION 1-A FOOTBALL HISTORY
MOST WINNING SEASONS 110
MOST UNDEFEATED SEASONS 25.
ENOUGH SAID.
GO BLUE!
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Aug 20, 2007
|
|
I think the above stats is why the losers from suckeye columbass obsess with everything Michigan. They want to be...they want to be... they want to be like UofM!
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
The new breed of Michigan players.
|
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 11, 2007
|
|
<table width="800" class="mcct_container">
<tbody>
<tr class="mcct_header">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr | |
