|
I'm afraid I'll have to be the only agreement with the OP here, then.
I think that Chacon had demonstrated for 8 innings that he was ON FIRE that night. 109 pitches? Whatever. It's not like he's Oswalt and has periodic issues where we need to protect him.
I have no doubt that had we left Chacon in there, we would have won. Maybe the 3-0 shutout wouldn't have held up, but would you take a 3-1 or 3-2 win that night? I sure would have. Would have been a great complete game for Chacon, and more importantly a WIN for the team. Instead, a 4-3 loss.
Valverde clearly hadn't recovered from the flu yet. First pitcher homer? Second pitch a HBP?!
I know Coop was thinking "3 run lead... gotta get Valverde his confidence back," but that was NOT the time for it. Let the starter go the distance every now and then. It's not like we have 4-men rotations anymore. Pitchers CAN throw complete games now and then.
Damned closer role.
|