The Dominant Conference

I'm just speculating

Exactly my point.

Don't start with this stronget conference crap again,then you get users here like rIdolph79 (who's not even a Pac-10 fan, he's a WCC fan who can't talk about anything and he has nothing else to do other than bash the Big East and stick up for the Pac-10) or Badgers that like to get upset just because you make a legitimate argument about the Big East being better than the Pac-10. Facts are facts, Marquette only lost by one to the "second best team in the Pac-10" and Marquette is only in the middle of the pack in the Big East. The Big East's last seed, Villanova beat Clemson maybe the third or fourth team out of the ACC. WVU beat Duke (the second best team out of the ACC) by 13 or something around there. WVU also beat Arizona who shouldn't have even been there in the first place. Like I said, i'm not going to argue, i'm just going to throw out some facts.

"Case for the big east is simple - got more teams in, "

But thats why they play the games!

So if you get the most in the Tourney, and lose the most?

Is that in some way a better deal?

I think NOT!

It seems to me that the Champion is the best example of a conf  being a top conf.

Just my 2 cents.

Wow, and Georgetown goes down. That just made my bracket that much stronger!

This is the year!!

Nate did you want to throw out the fact that lots of Big east teams are going home?

Hoyas?