powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Research is a start. Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Research is a start.


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Research is a start.
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Jun 21, 2007

May 10, 2008 5:20 pm
Okay we all know there is a correlation between artificial surfaces and players getting hurt it just is unbelievable that it has to be proven. Now this is just speculation on why people get hurt I wonder if the cleats either grip too much or too less of the turf (on cement) and it being unnatural does not rip up like natural grass (on dirt). Then again it is just speculation. But should they prove there be a relationship, does that not give grounds for lawsuits for players that had their careers ended prematurely because of the faulty turf. Just food for thought.  Besides artificial turf should be banned not because of the injuries directly caused by it but because of the injuries caused indirectly, ask any of the 1990-1998 Cowboy players, come on how many were sidelined due to concussions, then again we could just say the sport has been getting rougher.

Research is a start.
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 15, 2007

May 11, 2008 3:28 pm

Nobody said that it had to be proven.  If they can find the root of these injuries they may be able to prevent them.  Unfortunately I think field turf is here forever so you might as well try something to see if these injuries can be alleviated.

I don't think there would be any negligence on the part of the  turfmakers to warrant any lawsuits, but.....you never know in this country.


Research is a start.
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 24, 2006

May 11, 2008 5:43 pm
Yeah Boise State!!!!  Once again a non BCS team shows the way.  You'd think that a LSU or USC with their obvious interest in football would have some research in this area also.  Hopefully this research can help both the shoe manufacturers and the artificial turf folks make a better product.

Research is a start.
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 10, 2007

May 11, 2008 8:23 pm

My perspective is from a person who has both an engineering and biological background.

This article says the NFL spent a whopping 115 grand.  The NFL is a billion dollar making industry.  An injury caused by turf can take out a player that an NFL team has millions of dollars invested into.  It can knock a number 1 player out and cause his team to lose, and lead to a lesser team making the playoffs and hurting the NFL's ratings on TV. Bad ratings equals less monetary rights. 

So I am thinking, that a hundred grand seems like too little. I also feel it was something that should have been researched decades ago.

All this current Boise test does is test the load on the shoes feet and the ankle joints.  It doen't test for knee, connective tissue, and cartilage damage.  Grass grown in soil, distributes force downward more evenly and has less of a bounce than turf. The kinetic energy is absorbed into the ground. This bounce from the turf means some energy is actually not distributed downward but actually back up through the feet and creates extra stress on parts of the body. This stress creates extra wear and tear as well as injuries.

You are basically increasing the pounds per square inch of force being returned to the body.  Evolution has allowed bones, joints, and connective tissues to evolve over time based on normal wear and tear of normal people. Athletes in general, put extra wear and tear on their bones, joints, and connective tissues. This is more stress than evolution has prepared thebody for.  The turf bounce increases the statistical chance of an injury as well as the pounds per square inch on an injury prone location on the body.

Make a slower surface, that has better kinetic energy absorbing turf, with less bounce, and you will reduce injury. 


Research is a start.
-
Reputation:49
Level:Rookie
Since:May 11, 2008

May 11, 2008 10:14 pm
It's a GOOD thing for real studies to be done on this issue. The sport we love has too many injuries due to this. Who would want to see a top athlete lose their career just because of the playing surface? Not me.

The more studies they do, and the better turf they come up with is well invested as far as I'm concerned.

Play a great FREE football MMORPG at

 http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=10234002

Research is a start.
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Aug 21, 2006

May 12, 2008 11:17 am

wild-mike -

There would be no grounds for a lawsuit, there is no intent.

 

 

 

 

Packers Steelers  Saints Dolphins Giants Jets Patriots Eagles 49ers Browns Ravens Bengals Titans Colts Texans Broncos Seahawks Lions Jaguars Bills Chiefs