I'm tired of listening to all this incessant rambling from a bunch of people who don't know anything.
First I'm not a Pats fan, far from it.
1. On the offensive plays - it may be news to you, but it's not news to Goodell. They already know this because the Patriots came clean on everything.
2. Walsh - Freeman your poker analogy is stupid. Did he ever say he had evidence that proved anything beyond what had already came up? NO. In poker you bluff and if you are successful you win money, what did Walsh gain? NOTHING.
3. Boston Herald - So the Boston Herald publishes bunk information and it's Walsh's fault for not disproving it? You should be going after the Herald for publishing incorrect information but instead you defend them because "Every journalist has made at least one significant reporting mistake"
4. Freeman - You're throwing around some pretty strong statements with absolutely no evidence.
"At some point, he'll sit down and do a Barbara Walters, Oprah or Bryant Gumbel confessional interview"
"Walsh didn't do this by accident. I think, for whatever reason, he wanted Belichick and his old team to suffer."
Maybe if you actually did some real investigative journalism, "work" instead of sitting down and just typing out some crap in five minutes you could present some actual FACTS. I guess you get paid either way so why bother taking any pride in your work. Bet you were a good journalist at one point, when did you give up.
|
