powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08 Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08


View Message BoardViews:      


SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 3, 2006

May 20, 2008 11:36 pm

Tend to agree with you on that last comment, BT-45.

Also, as fans, we need to recognize that 'our teams' have all had high and low points in their history.  Would never try to compare LSU's history with UA's, ND's, USC's, OU's, and many others, too.  But have to say I am enjoying the current success very much, regardless on where we stack up in the heirarchy of CFB programs - and does that even matter anyway. 


SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:88
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 16, 2008

May 20, 2008 11:44 pm
666 is evil.

SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 6, 2006

May 21, 2008 2:39 am

Well lets see If LSU and UF were #1 then they beat OSU who ended up 3 or 4 so #1 LSU beat #3 or 4 OSU?  When UF played OSU they were #1and unbeaten, Florida was #2 in the BCS.  #2 beat #1.  Are you that shallow that you can remember a couple of years ago. Same thing Last year OSU was #1 and got beat by the #2 team LSU.  Your just trying to find some victory in your two Massacre losses to make your team look good.  That is the obvious stop trying to go off on wild tangents and complicate the obvious.  HAwaii went undefeated, IN THE WAC.  They only had 3 losses in 2 years 2 of them to SEC teams.  So are we saying that despite that,  Hawaii is phenominal?  Im not going to buy whatever your trying to sell.  I think your team is crap they have proved they are crap when it Matters MOST.  Why dont you ponder how to get better?  Oh because someone else outside the Big10 said so.

 This whole post is the biggest joke ever anyways i dont even know why i open my mouth here.  That was my mistake.  This was to try and get away with saying the SEC had a weakness its just no one is man enough to admit it.  So say what you want after this post i dont care.   Im not going to bikcer with you about the obvious FACTS.  Speaking of Windex why dont you use some to come clean the SEC's 2 Crystal Footballs.


SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Dec 7, 2006

May 21, 2008 10:51 am
Well lets see If LSU and UF were #1 then they beat OSU who ended up 3 or 4 so #1 LSU beat #3 or 4 OSU?  When UF played OSU they were #1and unbeaten, Florida was #2 in the BCS.  #2 beat #1.  Are you that shallow that you can remember a couple of years ago. Same thing Last year OSU was #1 and got beat by the #2 team LSU.Dude you're severely over complicating it.  After every game has been played, we have the most accurate ranking of a team.  The three teams that OSU lost to FINISHED with rankings of #1, #1, and #20.  It's kindergarten simple. 

Your just trying to find some victory in your two Massacre losses to make your team look good.  I don't need to find ways to make my team look good.  4-2 in BCS Bowls, and a BCS Championship already makes them look good.

That is the obvious stop trying to go off on wild tangents and complicate the obvious.  Dude, it's kindergaten simple.  Apparently that's still too complicated for you.  I'll work on making it pre-school simple.

HAwaii went undefeated, IN THE WAC.  They only had 3 losses in 2 years 2 of them to SEC teams.  So are we saying that despite that,  Hawaii is phenominal? 

Has the WAC averaged only ONE less top 25 team per year than the SEC this decade?  The Big Ten has.  It's apples and oranges comparing a team only having one loss in two years in the Big Ten, and one loss in two years in the WAC. 

 Is Hawaii 4-2 in BCS Bowls?  Does Hawaii have a National Championship this decade (or at all for that matter)?  You're grasping at straws with this stuff.

Im not going to buy whatever your trying to sell.  I could care less if you buy it.  You can claim the sky is green and the grass is blue.  You're claims don't change reality.

I think your team is crap they have proved they are crap when it Matters MOST.  So 4-2 in BCS Bowls is "proving you're crap when it matters most then right"?  Or are you saying that Tressel going 6-1 against our hated rival is "proving OSU is crap when it matters most?"  So what does that make you're team then?  0-1 in BCS Bowls, and six straight losses to your hated rival.

Why dont you ponder how to get better?  Oh because someone else outside the Big10 said so.

13-13 over the past two years.  0-1 in BCS Bowls.  SIX straight losses to your bitter rival Auburn.  Uhhhhhhh......I'm thinking that between OSU and Bama you might want to re-think who needs to ponder how to get better.  LMAO!

 This whole post is the biggest joke ever anyways i dont even know why i open my mouth here.  That was my mistake.  The mistake was spewing out garbage about how a team is crap that has an INFINITELY stronger resume in the BCS Era than your team.  The mistake was thinking that you could possibly take on BuckeyeTodd with all your nonsense, and not look like a complete tool. 

This was to try and get away with saying the SEC had a weakness its just no one is man enough to admit it.  So say what you want after this post i dont care.   Im not going to bikcer with you about the obvious FACTS.  Speaking of Windex why dont you use some to come clean the SEC's 2 Crystal Footballs.

Thanks for the offer, but I'm gonna have to pass.  Gotta save the Windex for OSU's BCS Trophy case.  Being tied for second most BCS Bowl wins has the trophy case filling up quite nicely. 

Come back and talk to me when Bama can win even ONE BCS game.  Come back and talk to me when they can beat their rival again.  Until then it's best to lay low......man.


SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 22, 2007

May 21, 2008 5:01 pm
2007/08   BCS Championship   LSU   Ohio State   38-24
2006/07   BCS Championship   Florida   Ohio State   41-14
2005/06   Fiesta   Ohio State    Notre Dame    34-20
2004/05   Alamo   Ohio State    Oklahoma State    33-7
2003/04   Fiesta   Ohio State    Kansas State    35-28
2002/03   Fiesta   Ohio State    Miami (FL)    31-24 (2OT)
4-2 is good,  but it not the greatest set of opponents in games 2, 3 and 4, There two "state" schools not necessarly known as football powrhouses and that other team that........... well ...........is greatly overhyped.

SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Dec 7, 2006

May 21, 2008 10:44 pm

4-2 is good,  but it not the greatest set of opponents in games 2, 3 and 4, There two "state" schools not necessarly known as football powrhouses and that other team that........... well ...........is greatly overhyped.

Man dude, you're becoming quite the hater aren't you Whodem?  So are you trying to say that three of OSU's BCS wins aren't legit, or are "lesser wins"?

1.  You're list isn't even accurate.  The Okie State Blowout wasn't a BCS game.  You left out the 1998-99 Sugar Bowl where #4 Ohio State beat the Big 12 Champs, #6 Texas A&M 24-14.

2.  You say that the other "State school" isn't known as a football powerhouse.  So you're saying only "known powerhouses" are great opponents?? 

Well that Kansas State team destroyed the #1 team in the nation Oklahoma in the Big 12 Championship game 35-7.  The same Oklahoma team that LSU only managed to beat 21-14 in the BCS Championship.  I'd say despite not being a "known powerhouse" that they were clearly a quality BCS opponent in 03/04.

3.  The Notre Dame team that OSU beat 34-20 was the same team that only lost by 3pts on the final play of the game to BCS Runner up USC due to the infamous (and illegal) "Bush Push".  That Notre Dame team had 14 players drafted in NFL.  But apparently they were "greatly over hyped".

4.  By your standards three of LSU's four BCS Bowl wins wouldn't be legit right?  Two were against Big Ten teams in Illinois and OSU, and we all know Big Ten teams are a joke right?  One was against Notre Dame who you label as "greatly over hyped" so throw that one out too.  It looks like LSU only has one legit BCS Bowl win against Oklahoma according to your standards right Whodem?

5.  Your claim is that OSU didn't have the greatest set of opponents in their 4 BCS wins.  Upon further review those wins are against:

  • TWO Big 12 Champs
  • An "unbeatable" Miami (FL) team that produced 19 draft picks, 10 of which were 1st rounders
  • A Notre Dame Team that produced 14 NFL draft picks (but was "greatly over hyped" according to Whodem)

Sometimes Bro you spout stuff out because you can't stand anyone other than LSU getting any credit.  You're a funny guy and all, but you need to take off the LSU goggles and see that LSU isn't the "be all end all" in CFB.  Trying to discredit three of the four BCS wins for OSU is pretty lame Bro.
 


SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 9, 2006

May 27, 2008 1:04 pm
Yeah!  What he said.

SEC is top.....not top to bottom better in 08
-
Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 10, 2008