I have a couple of questions for ND fans.
#1. Since when does a 3-9 team have any right to give an ultimatum like "Play at Giants stadium, or don't play," to a BCS team that not only went to a bowl game, but won it?
We are not Buffalo. You play at our place, or you don't play. You are in no position to boss us around. Your name means nothing.
#2. If Boston College's 35,000 seat stadium (or whatever it is) is good enough for you, why is what will be a 56,000 seat stadium not?
It's not as if RU doesn't treat our visiting opponents well. The opposing fans get two of the best views in the stadium, and there's no sun in their eyes at all if it's an afternoon game.
Playing at Giants Stadium would be in effect a road game for RU. All the Irish Catholic fans would grab up all of the seats. Getting students from RU to the Meadowlands would be an absolute nightmare.
In reality, it's not much of an improvement in terms of revenue, when you consider all the advertising money RU makes off of signs, etc. in their stadium. If we were to play at Giants Stadium, we'd have to pay them for the use of the stadium, plus we'd have no control over the advertising during the game. The financial benefits (maybe 15,000 tickets) would not outweight the financial losses (losing the advertising money), plus ESPN not being on campus for the game takes away from our publicity.
We don't need any help in recruiting from Notre Dame, thank you. You steal enough players from NJ. We're not about to bend over backwards to let you steal some more.
I couldn't be happier we told them to shove their ultimatum. Play on campus, or don't play. We don't need their "help". We are not making a mistake but not bending over for the guys that are too good to be in our conference for football, but ride our coattails in every other sport.
|