powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Shultz May Have A Case!!! Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Shultz May Have A Case!!!


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Shultz May Have A Case!!!
-
Reputation:84
Level:All-Star
Since:Jun 13, 2007

May 7, 2008 3:02 pm
The only problem I see even if Seattle wins the suit is that the owners still have to approve the sale. Right now I read that there is a price that the OKC group is paying the other owners to move the team at approx $30 million. So why would any of the other owners approve the sale to Balmer if they are going to be losing a little over a million each. Just something to think about - also the reason why the owners should have no $$ interest in the team staying or leaving.

Shultz May Have A Case!!!
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 10, 2007

May 7, 2008 4:34 pm

I don't know case law enough to know the answer to this question, so anyone who knows, please respond...

If Shultz wins his case, does that mean that all contracts that were signed after the sale are also voided?  That can get pretty sticky fast, since that includes everything from the arena deal in OKC, to personnel contracts.  I would like to think some sanity would be applied, but if voiding the sale also voids the OKC agreements, then what's to stop it from voiding the Ray Allen trade?

No flames please.  Like I said, I don't know case law enough to know the answers, hence the question.


Shultz May Have A Case!!!
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 28, 2006

May 9, 2008 6:10 pm
I can answer that question. If Shultz wins his case the sale to Bennett and his group will be voided. However, all agreements and contracts that involve players or personnel will remain as is as operation expenses and if Bennett and his group are forced to sale the team back to Schultz Bennett will not be able to request compensation for expenses he paid due to the fact that under his and his group's ownership they were operating based on fraud to the contract that they had with Schultz. And for the person who wrote that the owners would have to approve the resale of the team to Schultz, you have no idea what you are talking about the courts would make that decision not owners because there was a breech of contract. It is my hope that Schultz wins this case and that the Sonics stay in Seattle and then rebuild the team into a San Antonio like dynasty to where David Stern's stupid face hand over trophy after trophy to Seattle.