powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Have complaints, concerns or issues? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Have complaints, concerns or issues?


View Message BoardViews:      


Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Level:Amateur
Since:Jan 12, 2008

January 12, 2008 8:14 pm
James mentioned in the pre-game today that Jacksonville was trying to pull off an upset of "Biblical" proportions.  He's got a lot of nerve to correlate any value of this game to the importance of the Holy book of God.  In the future, please provide better references to the importance of games.

Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 20, 2006

January 15, 2008 4:27 pm
You justified a warning from another member that I referred to him/her as a woman?  I am supposed to take her at her word?  I believe she is a woman, she is a vindictive, manipulative person that uses several profiles to either hand out 0's or warnings, or act like other team's fan so that she can "infliltrate."  She's nuts, and you let her cost me my Superstar rating, which was about to be top 1K again.  Now I have to wait 3 mos, because of a fact about her anyway?!?  How am I supposed to know?  She lies all the time anyway.  Frivolous. 

Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 26, 2006

January 15, 2008 7:15 pm

I have already sent "EMAILS" via the "User Comments" link.  I just wanted to post my issue in the open so anyone who wants to see it, can.  Thanks.

==========

I was warned by CBS Admin on 11/7/07, for "too many warnings given and received; causing conflict".
Subsequently my rating went from 98(SS) to 94(AS).  OK, no big deal at the time.  I suppose I deserved it, if you say so.

Now, however, I would like my rating to be restored to 98.
These are the reasons ...
1) The post, by "Trollbuster1", that I warned @ 10/28/07 10:37:28 PM, has since been removed & now reads "This message has been removed by the administrator."
2) The pornographic avatar, by "Giants No Tom", that I warned @ 11/08/07 12:36:15 AM, is no longer in place, because CBS banned the user.  Searching for "Giants No Tom" now yields "ERROR!  Profile page for this Member not found."  CBS probably removed the SN for the same reason I warned it, maybe even more reasons.
3) The pornographic avatar, by "Vern Tokus", that I warned @ 11/17/07 12:48:00 AM, is no longer in place, because CBS banned the user.  Searching for "Vern Tokus" now yields "ERROR!  Profile page for this Member not found."  CBS probably removed the SN for the same reason I warned it, maybe even more reasons.
4) The post, by "Pooozzies", that I warned @ 11/23/07 12:46:33 PM, has since been removed & now reads "This message has been removed by the administrator."
5) The post, by "Fogcryalot", that I warned @ 11/24/07 02:51:50 PM, has since been removed & now reads "This message has been removed by the administrator."

The above 5 warnings are the only ones I issued that remain in my profile.  CBS either removed the post or the user in each of the 5 instances.
Doesn't that show that my warnings were "justified" and that the warning given me by CBS Admin was bogus?
Looks like it does.  I'll expect my rating @ 98 NLT Thursday evening.

Thanks for your time,
Mudsville Geo


Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 22, 2007

January 15, 2008 8:45 pm
<table width="800" class="mcct_container"> <tbody> <tr class="mcct_header"> <td> WHAY WAS THIS POST REMOVED. I DO NOT SEE WHY IT IS NOT A LEGITIMATE POST. CAN YOU CLARIFY THIS?</td> </tr> <tr class="mcct_body" valign="top"> <td> This message has been removed by the administrator.

 

Thank you in advance for looking for a chink in the armor of the SEC,  we will take it as a compliment of the 3rd highest order. As a firm believer in "you get out, what you put" in I see no issues with OOC schedules. Fact is, most SEC have to take a serious paycut to play an away OOC game. Put on your SEC AD hats for a minute and ponder this.....

A) Stay at home, bring in a rental win or even a challenge (VT) for a day and make fans happy. Pay your for $500,000 and keep the remaining $5,000,000 (92,000 x $50 est + concessions) for yourself less gatoraid and cat litter in the case of Mike the Tiger @ LSU. There is very little downside in this option.

B) Go on the road get maybe $1,000,000 ( - $4,000,000) and face a potentcial loss knowing you have 8 conference games of which 4 are on the road and 6 will be difficult at best. You also know that your SOS will be fine due to the conference strenght. All in the sake of making someone from outside the conference happy. There is a host of downside here.

As a AD that is charged with doing what is BEST for your employer, which would you choose?

</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 12, 2006

January 16, 2008 4:56 am
You justified a warning from another member that I referred to him/her as a woman?  I am supposed to take her at her word?  I believe she is a woman, she is a vindictive, manipulative person that uses several profiles to either hand out 0's or warnings, or act like other team's fan so that she can "infliltrate."  She's nuts, and you let her cost me my Superstar rating, which was about to be top 1K again.  Now I have to wait 3 mos, because of a fact about her anyway?!?  How am I supposed to know?  She lies all the time anyway.  Frivolous.  OMG......That is too funny!!! I know that Sconiels is a guy.....so you're actually wrong about that. Dang. That sucks. I know we don't get along, but Sconiels did you wrong. I think the only reason that it didn't get overturned is because you have several warnings. I'm pretty sure that after you get 3 they don't allow you to challenge them. Sucks, huh. I lost my favorite profile to some moron who did that to me.

Have complaints, concerns or issues?
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 20, 2006

January 16, 2008 12:04 pm

I lost my favorite profile to some moron who did that to me.

We could get along, we just like the two best teams in the AFC West, so that probably won't happen. 

I hope you don't take my jabs personally.  It's meant in good fun.

Yeah, I couldn't believe