powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Acquiring malcontent stars leaves everybody disgruntled Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Acquiring malcontent stars leaves everybody disgruntled

 

There's a lesson here, for anyone looking hard enough to find it. But you'll have to look awfully hard, through all those layers of Shaquille O'Neal's fat and past Allen Iverson's selfishness. And you'll have to look with wisdom, careful not to be fooled by the two faces of Jason Kidd.

But if you can do all that, congratulations. You're smarter than the average NBA general manager, who would happily gut his team for the chance to add an NBA superstar.

This might be the closest Jason Kidd got to Chris Paul the entire series. (Getty Images)  
This might be the closest Jason Kidd got to Chris Paul the entire series. (Getty Images)  
How did that work out, Phoenix Suns?

Dallas Mavericks?

Denver Nuggets?

The three most disappointing teams in the 2008 NBA playoffs. The three teams who traded for the disgruntled superstar. See the connection? Is the lesson starting to seep in?

This postseason ought to be enough to jar NBA executives out of their favorite trade adage, which postulates thusly: In any trade, no matter how many teams and players are involved, find the biggest superstar in the deal and circle his new team. That's who won the trade.

That's the theory, but like so many theories -- Rome being invincible, Earth being flat, Bush being right -- it has crumbled under the weight of reality. Not to mention the weight of Shaquille's ass.

Here's the thing about an NBA superstar: Wherever he is, if he's miserable, he's part of the problem. Too much losing, not enough touches, not enough respect or attention or whatever ... he's not immune.

And whatever was wrong in one city, it will be wrong in the next.

There's concrete data here, people.

Allen Iverson was a loser in Philadelphia, and he's been a loser in Denver. Great player? No question. He's one of the most incredible individual talents ever. But he's a loser, the anti-Midas, and his toxic touch followed him to Denver, which disgraced itself in a first-round sweep by the Lakers. The Nuggets quit in that series, dissolving under the leadership -- such as it is -- of its selfish point guard. Iverson, Carmelo Anthony and J.R. Smith took turns going one-on-five, jacking up 214 shots while begrudgingly handing out just 33 assists in 412 combined minutes. Selfish is as selfish does, and Iverson is the most selfish superstar this league has ever seen.

Unsurprisingly, the 76ers have been better off without him. They were 5-12 (.294) when he forced the trade to Denver early last season, then went 30-35 (.462) the rest of that season and 40-42 (.488) this season. While Denver flamed out in four games in the 2008 playoffs, the 76ers are putting up a fight against Detroit.

CONTINUED: 1 · 2 · Next »
 
Talk Back
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 27, 2006

May 1, 2008 11:54 am
Doyel you are an idiot.  Picking up a superstar player is a great way to win a championship.  It doesn't work everytime only because one team can win the championship.  Lets take a look back at some recent title winners.  The Miami Heat picked up disgruntled star Shaq, what happens, they win the NBA title.  The Pistons trade for disgruntled star Rasheed Wallace, the result ...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 26, 2008

May 1, 2008 4:09 pm
It is always unclear who is a malcontent star and who isn't. Kobe Bryant was a malcontent before he realized how good Andrew Bynum had become and that the front office was willing to get a guy like Gasol. I don't think that Boston represents a great example either. I don't think the Celtics success rests solely on the big three. All of those guys are old, and have been spelled signific ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 16, 2007

May 1, 2008 3:37 pm
Kevin Garnett, Rasheed Wallace, Shaq to the Lakers early in his career (not a trade, but an upset superstar), Shaq to the Heat, Ray Allen to the Celts, Glen Rice to the Lakers, Dennis Rodman to the Bulls, Mark Aguire to the Pistons, Moses Malone to the 76ers.

 Hey Greg, is there any chance whatsoever that  coaching, and not personnel was an issue?  D'antoni 2x agains
...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 21, 2006

May 2, 2008 4:14 pm

I'm not sure how long it has been since his name and superstar have been mentioned in the same sentence, but I just read that grant hill has never made it out of the first round.  Isn't that crazy?  I remember how bad the league wanted him to be the next Jordan, and his contracts on and off the court we're crazy huge.  I mean never won a series in his career, WOW.&nbs ...(more)

Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 30, 2006

May 2, 2008 10:18 am
I get the arguments for why Kidd and Iverson are selfish, or malcontents, or team cancers, or whatever.  I don't necessarily agree with them, especially when it comes to Iverson, but I understand them.  But how in the world does Shaq fit into that mold?  The guy is one of the best ambassadors for the game that the NBA has ever had.  I can't recall a single instance (asi ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 3, 2007

May 1, 2008 2:03 pm

Haha Ive got my clever title hat on today.  Anyway, Doyel youre completely right.  I mentioned this in my blog yesterday.  I think anytime you add a superstar midseason it is a disaster.  It ruins team chemistry and usually your teams depth and rotation, and most of the time the superstar doesn't fit into your team concept. 

Now I understand what both the Su ...(more)

Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 13, 2006

May 1, 2008 2:01 pm
The Lakers traded because they got an incredible deal -  A fabulous player for next to nothing.  Memphis was gonna lose Gasol soon and traded for hope in the future.
Boston traded for the best player in the game and got him.  Minny traded because they also knew they were going to lose him.  These other trades seemed to be desperation moves to keep up with the rest of the
...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 25, 2006

May 1, 2008 10:23 pm

The Kidd and Shaq deals were trade deadline reaches, to say the least.  Kidd can shine in an All-star game because it is what it is, a circus.  But rely on him to get you "over the hump?"  You may as well sign Gary Payton.  Mark Cuban needs to get a luxury box and stay out of the way.

Shaq got in shape one time to spite the Lakers.  However, he co ...(more)